God's Catholic Dogma
It is 100% certain you're headed for Hell  ...   for rejecting the Catholic Dogma  ...   Warning: There are no bishops or priests in these times
<< On this site ... you will discover how you are being sent into Hell forever ...  your willingness to be deceived is making you eternally culpable >>
 
1.   The Original Sin of Adam closed Heaven for all men (sanctifying grace was lost) ... Hell became the only possible destination for the immortal souls of men.
2.   God re-opened Heaven by founding the Catholic Church and re-introducing sanctifying grace to men's souls ... the same grace which Adam and Eve had lost.
 
We are currently in the Great Apostasy (world-wide rejection of God's Catholic Dogma), these warnings apply:
3.   Warning 1:  A non-Catholic anti-Christ cult (the vatican-2 heretic cult) took over all of our formerly Catholic properties on 8 December 1965 ... the "V-2 council" close date.
4.   Warning 2:  The buildings with Catholic signs out front are not Catholic Churches at this time. God has allowed the Mass to be taken away (Sections 88 and 90).
5.   Warning 3:  All those dressed up like Catholic bishops and priests are ... automatically excommunicated heretics against the Catholic Dogma (Sections 12 and 13.2).
6.   Warning 4:  You must verify for yourself that a heretic cult has taken over our formerly Catholic properties ... simply take the steps outlined in Section 21.5.
* vatican-2-ists: You are automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church … Abjuration to re-enter on Section 19.1 *
 
7.   One can still be Catholic and get to Heaven with a proper baptism in water (Section 7) ... believing the Dogmas ... and keeping free from mortal sin (Section 10.1).
8.   All grace, both actual and sanctifying grace, starts with God and comes into the world through the Blessed Virgin ... as Jesus Christ Himself did (Section 4).
9.   The Old Testament Israelite religion was the Catholic Faith unfulfilled ... the "judaism" man-made fable started about 200 B.C. (Section 39.1).  Jesus Christ was not a jew.
10.  All heretics are in sin against the First Commandment (Section 8) ... and are headed for Hell ... with the pagans of the world (all those not properly baptized in water).

* *  Return To Index  >  click here  >  for more against the soul damning lies  * *
 
E-mail >    Slave_BVM @ mail.com   --   Catholic_Dogma_Providers @ mail.com   
 
Translate (traduire, übersetzen, tradurre, trasladar, 번역) this Section  ...  now (maintenant, jetzt, ora, ahora, 지금) ... to your language ...
(1) You must have Adobe Flash Player installed.   (2) Chinese, Korean, or Japanese characters not displaying ... see Appendix E.

<<< --- <<< --- <<< --- <<< ---  Start Section 131  --- >>> --- >>> --- >>> --- >>>

The heresies and lies of the "cmri" hoax...
This cult, like the vatican-2 heretic cult is completely non-Catholic and causes the loss of your soul

The "cmri" cult (like the vatican-2 cult) ... has all it's people headed for Hell
(in a very Catholic looking way, of course)

Catholic writing of Saint Mark 7:7
"And in vain do they worship Me, teaching doctrines and precepts of men."

Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Proverbs 21:27
"The sacrifices of the wicked are abominable, because they are offered of wickedness."

~     ~     ~

Introduction:

1.  Ngo Dinh Thuc was automatically excommunicated for heresy on 8 December 1965 ... when he approved the mountain of heresy in the "vatican-2 council" documents. After Thuc fell excommunicated he did not ... and could not ... Ordain priests or Consecrate Bishops after 8 December 1965. Thuc remained on as a group leader for the vatican-2 heretic cult (founded in 1965) which re-confirmed the fact that he was automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church.

2.  Making #1 above a moot point is the spiritual fact that ... Ngo Dinh Thuc was not consecrated a Bishop by Antonio Drapier on 4 May 1938. Automatically excommunicated anti-Pope "Pius XI" did not have the capability to grant Drapier Catholic jurisdiction to ordain or consecrate anyone. See Section 20.1 of this site for selected heresies of anti-Pope "Pius XI".

3.  The "cmri" sends people into Hell with a very Catholic looking outward appearance ... since they are in violation of a host of Catholic Dogmas. They say a lot of Catholic words, use a lot of Catholic artwork, dress like Catholic priests and bishops, and do a lot of Catholic looking actions (all stolen from the Catholic Church) ... to bring about your eternal damnation.

For the next points ... set aside for a moment that the "cmri" has zero priests and has never had a bishop ...

4.  The "cmri" is in heresy against the Catholic Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma, see Sub-part C below.

5.  The "cmri" is in heresy against the Catholic Dogma on Water Baptism (Sub-part D below) ... and because of this they also violate the Catholic Salvation Dogma, see Sections 7, 7.2, and 7.6 of this site.

6.  Epikeia cannot be used against Catholic Dogma, it can only be used against man-made law and discipline, see Sub-part F below. The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult is not a source of Catholic Jurisdiction or governance, see Sections 12 and 13 and sub-sections of this site.

7.  The "cmri" is in heresy against the Catholic Dogma that "ignorance" of the Dogma does not get anyone into Heaven. They mercilessly promote the devil's canard that one must "knowingly" reject the Catholic Church as the true Church, in order for the Catholic Salvation Dogma to apply to them. In other words, those "ignorant" of everything are going straight to Heaven, how luciferian can the "cmri" get? See Sub-part I below.

8.  The "cmri", because of their violation of Dogma ... is (another) non-Catholic illusion ... they "sacrifice" to a non-Catholic "god", in a very Catholic looking manner. See Sub-part H below and Sections 88 and 90 of this site.

9.  Since the "cmri" is a non-Catholic entity it, by definition, sends all of its participants into Hell forever. Section 19.1 provides instructions for how to re-enter the Catholic Church via Formal Abjuration after physical participation in a heretical entity such as the vatican-2 cult or the "cmri" .

10.  If you are mixed up in the "cmri" please review this Section carefully and ask the Blessed Virgin for the grace to let you see the fact that the ""cmri"" (like the vatican-2 cult) is a heretical society ... no matter how "Catholic" they look.

11.  The "cmri" uses evil done in previous times to justify their evil. For example, they justify their heresy of "supplied jurisdcition" using the heretical writing of anti-Pope "Benedict XV" in the "1917 code of canon law". The heretic cabal who wrote the "1917 code" in a non-Dogmatic venue, cannot override the Catholic Sources of Dogma on Jurisdiction from the Pope in union with the bishops of the world in Dogmatic venues.

12.  The "cmri" is simply part of a mop-up operation to bring about the loss of the souls of the "opposition" to the vatican-2 revolt, the "cmri" promotes much of the same heresy as the vatican-2 heretic cult ... thus it causes it's participants to be automatically excommunicated for physical participation in a heretical society (in addition to them not having Catholic jurisdiction).

~     ~     ~

This Section includes ...
 
Sub-part A-1:   The "cmri"  has no Catholic "lineage", they have no (and never had any) bishops or priests. Thuc was automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church on 8 December 1965. The often cited "extraordinary patriarchal powers" granted to Thuc by anti-Pope "Pius XII" never applied (of course) since Thuc was never consecrated a bishop (heresies of "Pius XII" on Section 20.2).
 
Sub-part A-2:   Ngo Dinh Thuc was not consecrated a bishop on 4 May 1938. Heretic anti-Pope "Pius XI" was incapable of granting Catholic jurisdiction to Antonio Drapier to consecrate Ngo Dinh Thuc or anyone else ... since "Pius XI" was automatically excommunicated for heresy and outside of the Catholic Church. Selected heresies of "Pius XI" on Section 20.1 of this site. If you illicitly reject this, Sub-part A-2 also proves that Ngo Dinh Thuc never consecrated or ordained anyone after 8 December 1965 for the "cmri", the vatican-2 heretic cult, or any other cult.
 
Sub-part B:   Instances in past centuries when there were interregnums (the Papacy being vacant) or when anti-Popes were in place ... do not apply to the current situation (the 100% vatican-2 apostasy) ... because during these past times the bishops around the world had previously received jurisdiction from a Pope.
 
Sub-part C:   The "cmri" is in continuous heresy against the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.
 
Sub-part D:   The "cmri" is in heresy against the Water Baptism Dogma, grinding it under their heels.
 
Sub-part E:   The "cmri" continuously promotes the heresy of "supplied jurisdiction" ... they must push this lie for their very existence.
 
Sub-part F:   The "cmri" is lying about Epikeia (Canonical Equity). Epikeia can only be used against man-made law, it cannot be used against Divine Law (the Dogma) on Jurisdiction and Governance.
 
Sub-part G:   The "cmri" is in heresy by "teaching" that man-made canon law can override the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.
 
Sub-part H:   The "cmri" is lying that the Mass comes before the Dogmas of the Faith. The Faith comes before the Mass. The "Mass" of the "cmri" is offered to a non-Catholic idol.
 
Sub-part I:   The "cmri" is in heresy against the Catholic Salvation Dogma in a number of ways, including saying that "ignorance" saves.
 
Sub-part J:   God does not command impossibilities regarding the Sacraments ... Necessity of Means and Necessity of Precept regarding the Sacraments.
 
Sub-part K:   Summary and Required Catholic Remedy ... after involvement in the "cmri" cult.
 
Sub-part L:   Additional "Thuc line" heretics who are not "cmri"  ... to which the above applies regarding Jurisdiction, and most likely the other heresies.



S u b - p a r t    A-1

The "cmri"  has no Catholic "lineage", they have no (and never had any) bishops or priests. Thuc was automatically excommunicated
from the Catholic Church on 8 December 1965. The often cited "extraordinary patriarchal powers" granted to Thuc
by anti-Pope "Pius XII" never applied (of course) since Thuc was never consecrated a bishop.

~     ~     ~

For the sake of this Sub-part ... set aside the fact that Thuc was never consecrated a bishop.

1.  Thuc was automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church on 8 December 1965 when he approved of the fantastic heresy against Catholic Dogma which was in the "vatican-2 council" documents. Many Catholic Sources of Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy are listed on Section 13.2 of this site. See Section 12, for fifty of the well over 200 heresies in the "council" documents.

2.  After 8 December 1965, Thuc proceeded to be a group leader for the vatican-2 heretic cult (which was founded at the "council") ... his remaining as a group leader for the vatican-2 heresy re-confirmed his automatic excommunication from the Catholic Church.

3.  One who is excommunicated from the Catholic Church cannot consecrate Catholic bishops for the Catholic Church and he cannot ordain priests for the Catholic Church ... since he has nothing to do with the Church.

4.  Anti-Pope "Pius XII" granting "extraordinary patriarchal powers" (which was a "re-newing" of the same granted by anti-Pope "Pius XI" on 15 March 1938 (heresies of "Pius XI" listed on Section 20.1)) ... to Thuc do not make the Thuc "consecrations" valid (or licit) for the following reasons:

A.  On 8 December 1965, the close date of the heretical "vatican-2 council" ... there was not a single Bishop in the world who rejected the vatican-2 cult heresy (including Thuc). This means Catholic Jurisdiction disappeared from the world on this date (but not the Catholic Faith) since Catholic Jurisdiction can be granted in only one way, via the Office of the Papacy, see Sub-parts B and C below.

B.  Set aside for a moment that "Pius XI" and "Pius XII" were heretics and that Thuc was excommunicated on 8 December 1965 ... The application of the often cited "extraordinary patriarchal powers" ... cannot overrule the Sources of Dogma defined by the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world on Jurisdiction. The Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance, covered in Sub-part C, states that all Catholic Jurisdiction must originate with the Papacy and a unilateral decree (by one bishop) in a non-Dogmatic venue, cannot overrule the Dogma.

The consequences of all of the above as applied to the "cmri"  is as follows ...

>  Thuc did not consecrate Moises Carmona a Bishop on 17 October 1981 ... because the automatically excommunicated Thuc was not in the Catholic Church.

>  Thuc did not consecrate Adolfo Zamora a Bishop on 17 October 1981 ... because the automatically excommunicated Thuc was not in the Catholic Church.

>  Mark Pivarunas was not consecrated a Bishop by Carmona on 24 Sepember 1991 ... because Carmona was not made a Catholic Bishop by Thuc.

>  George Musey did not ordain Mark Pivarunas on 27 June 1985 because Musey was not made a Bishop by Carmona and Adolfo Zamora on 1 April 1982.

Sub-part summary: The "cmri"  group leader who is dressed up like a Catholic priest and who is doing a stage show that looks like a Catholic Mass ... more than likely underwent what looked like an ordination by layperson Pivarunas ... so he isn't a Catholic priest. For any others who are dressed up like priests in the "cmri"  meeting halls see the below two notes.

Note 1: The other reasons (besides Jurisdiction and no Catholic ordinations) that the "cmri"  is not Catholic worship is covered in the other Sub-parts of this Section.

Note 2: Covered below ... a group which promotes "baptism of desire" cannot be a Catholic entity (see Sections 7.2 and 7.6), a group with promotes that "ignorance" of the Catholic Faith gets people to Heaven cannot be a Catholic entity (see Section 5.1).



S u b - p a r t    A-2

Ngo Dinh Thuc was not consecrated a bishop on 4 May 1938. Heretic anti-Pope "Pius XI" was incapable of granting
Catholic jurisdiction to Antonio Drapier to consecrate Ngo Dinh Thuc or anyone else ... since "Pius XI" was
automatically excommunicated for heresy and outside of the Catholic Church.

~     ~     ~

1.  On 4 May 1938 ... it looked like Antonio Drapier was consecrating Ngo Dinh Thuc ... to be a Catholic Bishop, but Drapier was not doing so.

2.  The reason Drapier did not actually make Thuc a Bishop ... is because automatically excommunicated anti-Pope "Pius XI" did not have the capability of granting Drapier Catholic Jurisdiction (to Ordain or Consecrate) ... since "Pius XI" was outside of the Catholic Church for heresy (as is proven on Section 20.1 of this site).

3.  On 7 Oct 1929 ... when it looked like "Pius XI" was granting Drapier Catholic Jurisdiction ... Drapier (in reality) was not granted jurisdictional powers from heretic "Pius XI".

4.  This the reason Thuc was never consecrated a Bishop.

5.  If you illicitly reject the above ... Sub-part A-2 below proves by another reason ... that Thuc did not ordain or consecrate anyone after 8 December 1965 (the close date of the "vatican-2 council".



S u b - p a r t    B

Instances in past centuries when there were interregnums (the Papacy being vacant) or when anti-Popes were in place ... do not
apply to the current situation (the 100% vatican-2 apostasy) ... because during these past times the bishops
around the world had previously received jurisdiction from a Pope.

~     ~     ~

1.  Probably most of those in the "cmri"  know enough about Church history to know that there have been around 40 anti-Popes and a number of instances where the Office of the Papacy was vacant between Popes for more than a short period of time.

2.  During a long interregnum ... such as when Pope Clement IV died in November 1268 and Pope Gregory X was not elected until September 1271 (almost three years) ... the Catholic bishops around the world had been granted Catholic jurisdiction by Pope Clement IV or an earlier Pope. In the case of the vatican-2 apostasy, all bishops (with no exception) lost their Offices as Catholic bishops by heresy on 8 December 1965 ... so that Catholic jurisdiction around the world ceased on 8 December 1965.

3.  In the times when anti-Popes were in place ... there were true Popes in place (who the anti-Popes were in opposition against) who provided Catholic Jurisdiction to the bishops around the world. For example ... anti-Pope "Clement III" was in opposition to true Pope Victor II (who was supplying Catholic jurisdiction) ... or anti-Pope "Benedict XIV" in opposition to true Pope Martin V (who was supplying Catholic jurisdiction).

4.  So when the "cmri"  or other non-jurisdictional groups claim ... that they can go off and run Catholic looking liturgies without Catholic jurisdiction ... citing the reasons outlined in numbers 2 and 3 above, they are simply lying. During the times described above Catholic jurisdiction from the Office of the Papacy was in place ... in accordance with the infallible Sources of Dogma on Jurisdiction shown on Section 87 of this site, which define the one prescribed way by which Catholic jurisdiction can be put in place.



S u b - p a r t    C

The "cmri" is in continuous heresy against the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.

~     ~     ~

1.  For any group to be a Catholic entity it must satisfy the below listed Dogmatic citations from the Council of Florence and the Vatican Council of 1870 which address Jurisdiction and Governance.

2.  God knew that the Catholic Church was going to lose its buildings in 1965 at the close of the "council" of apostasy to the vatican-2 cult ... this is a test of Faith that we don't go running off to non-jurisdictional entities who also sacrifice to idols (like the vatican-2 cult) and in which there is no absolution of sins. The loss of the continual sacrifice was foretold five times see  >  Daniel 8:11, Daniel 8:12, Daniel 8:13, Daniel 9:27, and Daniel 11:31 ... this started on 8 December 1965 when the vatican-2 cult began sacrificing to the vatican-2 god.

Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Daniel 11:31 >
"And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall defile the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the continual sacrifice, and they shall place there the abomination unto desolation."

3.  The vatican-2 jew-heretic cult is not a source of Catholic Jurisdiction, since they are not Catholic in Faith (see Sections 12 and 13). The vatican-2 cult can use the word "Pope" to identify its leader but this is a lie since only the Catholic Church has the Office of the Papacy. See Sections 13.4, 13.5, and 13.6 regarding the Papacy and Catholic Jurisdiction.

4.  Dogmatic citations that there is one and only one possible source of Catholic Jurisdiction and governance in the world are listed here in Sub-part C.

5.  The only possible source of Catholic Jurisdiction and governance is hierarchically under the See of Peter for the entire Church around the whole world ... but since this See has fallen vacant by heresy, by dogmatic definition Catholic Jurisdiction and governance does not exist in the world at this time. See Section 13.2 of this site for the Sources of Dogma on automatic excommunication for heresy which is operative against all vatican-2 cult personnel (who are dressed like Catholic bishops and priests and who reside in our formerly Catholic buildings).

6.  The "cmri" lies about "supplied jurisdiction" which is complete heresy ... this heresy states that jurisdiction can be "supplied by the people" in "times of emergency" (this heresy is covered in Sub-part E).

7.  The fact that the single possible source of Catholic Jurisdiction and governance has fallen vacant by heresy ... does not mean you cannot get to Heaven. You can still be fully Catholic and get to Heaven, it simply means that God has allowed the Mass and Sacramental Confession to be taken away ... see Sections 7.4 and 10.2 which address Necessity of Means and times when Confession is not available.



The Dogma of the Catholic God ... that the "cmri" is continually rejecting by their very existence:
 
~   ~

Dogmatic Council of Florence, Laetentur Coeli (Decree of Union), 6 July 1439 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"We likewise define that the holy Apostolic See, and the Roman Pontiff, hold the primacy throughout the entire world; and that the Roman Pontiff himself is the successor of blessed Peter, the chief of the Apostles, and the true vicar of Christ, and that he is the head of the entire Church, and the father and teacher of all Christians; and that full power was given to him in blessed Peter by our Lord Jesus Christ, to feed, rule, and govern the universal Church."

Application of this Source of Dogma:
There is no physical group in the world who can meet this dogmatic definition. The vatican-2 cult does not meet this definition because they are a non-Catholic heretical society ... and neither do any of the "independents" ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) since this Source of Dogma states that for a group to be a Catholic entity they would have to be in the single governance which is throughout the entire world, under the head of the entire Church under the See of Peter (not in place at this time, it has been lost via heresy).



Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 2 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Wherefore we teach and declare that, by Divine ordinance, the Roman Church possesses a pre-eminence of ordinary power over every other church, and that this Jurisdictional power of the Roman Pontiff is both episcopal and immediate. Both clergy and faithful, of whatever rite and dignity, both singly and collectively, are bound to submit to this power by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience, and this not only in matters concerning faith and morals, but also in those which regard the discipline and government of the Church throughout the world."

Application of this Source of Dogma:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult does not meet this Dogmatic definition because they are a heretical society ... and neither do any of the "independents" ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) since this Source of Dogma states that for a group to be a Catholic entity they must be under the government and in a hierarchical subordination ... of a single group which is throughout the world under the immediate Jurisdictional power of the office of the Roman Pontiff (not in place at this time, lost through heresy).



Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 9 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"So, then, if anyone says that the Roman pontiff has merely an office of supervision and guidance, and not the full and supreme power of Jurisdiction over the whole Church, and this not only in matters of faith and morals, but also in those which concern the discipline and government of the Church dispersed throughout the whole world; or that he has only the principal part, but not the absolute fullness, of this supreme power; or that this power of his is not ordinary and immediate both over all and each of the churches and over all and each of the pastors and faithful: let him be anathema."

Application of this citation:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult does not meet this Dogmatic definition because they are a heretical society ... and neither do any of the "independents" ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) since this Source of Dogma states that for a group to be a Catholic entity they must be in the Jurisdiction over the whole Church including matters of government ... in a group which is throughout the whole world under the office of the Roman Pontiff (not in place at this time, lost through heresy).

This Source of Dogma has an anathema attached to it ... the anathema is part of this infallible decree, and because of this, the anathema is infallibly applied to all of the souls who are in violation of this dogmatic citation.



Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 6 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Furthermore, it follows from that supreme power which the Roman Pontiff has in governing the whole Church, that he has the right, in the performance of this office of his, to communicate freely with the pastors and flocks of the entire Church, so that they may be taught and guided by him in the way of salvation."

Application of this Source of Dogma:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult does not meet this Dogmatic definition because they are a heretical society ... and neither do any of the "independents" ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) since this Source of Dogma states that for a group to be a Catholic entity they must be in the governing (of) the whole Church ... and part of the entire Church.



Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 8 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Since the Roman Pontiff, by the Divine right of the Apostolic primacy, governs the whole Church, we likewise teach and declare that he is the supreme judge of the faithful."

Application of this Source of Dogma:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult does not meet this Dogmatic definition because they are a heretical society ... and neither do any of the "independents" ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) since this Source of Dogma states that for a group to be a Catholic entity they must be in a single government of the whole Church under the Apostolic primacy (not in place at this time, lost through heresy).



Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 3: On the ... Primacy of the Roman Pontiff, Part 1 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"The Apostolic see and the Roman Pontiff hold a world-wide primacy, and that ... To him, in Blessed Peter, full power has been given by our Lord Jesus Christ to tend, rule and govern the universal Church."

Application of this citation:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult does not meet this Dogmatic definition because they are a heretical society ... and neither do any of the "independents" ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) that offers a Catholic looking liturgy, since this Source of Dogma states that for a group to be a Catholic entity they must be governed within the universal Church under the full power given to Blessed Peter. The See of Peter has been lost in these times, with the rest of our formerly Catholic properties, when the vatican-2 heretic cult took over our properties in 1965 at the close of the "vatican-2 council".



Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 1: On the institution of the Apostolic Primacy in Blessed Peter, Part 1 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"We teach and declare that, according to the gospel evidence, a primacy of Jurisdiction over the whole Church of God was immediately and directly promised to the Blessed Apostle Peter and conferred on him by Christ the Lord."

Application of this Source of Dogma:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult does not meet this Dogmatic definition because they are a heretical society ... and neither do any of the "independents" ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) that offers a Catholic looking liturgy because this Source of Dogma states that for a group to be a Catholic entity they must be part of the primacy of Jurisdiction over the whole Church under the successors of Blessed Apostle Peter.

There is no Apostolic Succession at this time (there are only vatican-2 cult heretic group leaders) but the Apostolic Faith (the Catholic Dogma) is still in the world, so the gates of Hell have not prevailed against the Church. The term "gates of Hell" was defined at the Second Council of Constantinople. The phrase "gates of Hell" is wrongly used when this phrase is used in reference to the Papacy ... as seen in this Source of Dogma:

Second Council of Constantinople, Pope Vigilius, 553 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"We bear in mind what was promised about the Holy Church and Him who said the gates of Hell will not prevail against it, by these we understand the death-dealing tongues of heretics."



Vatican Council of 1870, Session 4, Chapter 1: On the institution of the Apostolic Primacy in Blessed Peter, Part 6 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Therefore, if anyone says that Blessed Peter the Apostle was not appointed by Christ the Lord as prince of all the Apostles and visible head of the whole church militant; or that it was a primacy of honour only and not one of true and proper Jurisdiction that he directly and immediately received from our Lord Jesus Christ Himself: let him be anathema."

Application of this Source of Dogma:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult does not meet this Dogmatic definition because they are a heretical society ... and neither does any other group in the world ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) that offers a Catholic looking liturgy, since this Source of Dogma states that for a group to be a Catholic entity they must part of the whole church militant and under the true and proper Jurisdiction under the successors of Blessed Peter the Apostle (not in place at this time, lost through heresy).



Related Citations regarding Catholic Jurisdiction and Governance ... Rejected by the "cmri" 
 
~   ~

Pope Pius IX, Quanta cura, 8 Dec 1864 >
"There is no one who does not see and understand clearly and openly how opposed this is to the Catholic Dogma of the plenary (complete in every respect; absolute) power divinely bestowed on the Roman Pontiff by Christ the Lord Himself of feeding, ruling, and governing the universal Church."

Application of this teaching:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult cannot be in accord with this instruction from Pope Pius IX because they are a heretical society, and other groups that offer Catholic looking liturgy ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) are not because they are in heresy against the Sources of Dogma which address Catholic Jurisdiction and Governance.



Pope Pius VI, Super Soliditate, 28 Nov 1786 >
"Are so many solemn decrees of the Popes and Councils repeated so many times to be called fanatic, by which those have been condemned who denied that in blessed Peter, the prince of the Apostles, his successor, the Roman Pontiff, was established by God as the visible head of the Church and the vicar of Jesus Christ, that to him has been transmitted full power of ruling the Church, and that true obedience is due him from all who are considered Christians; and that such is the power of the primacy, which he holds by divine right, that he is superior to other bishops not only by his rank of honor but by the plenitude of his supreme power?"

Application of this teaching:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult cannot be in accord with this instruction from Pope Pius VI because they are a heretical society, and other groups that offer Catholic looking liturgy ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) are not because they are in heresy against the Sources of Dogma which address Catholic Jurisdiction and Governance.



Pope Leo XIII, Testem Benevolentiae, 22 January 1899 >
"Now the history of all past ages is witness that this Apostolic See, to which not only the office of teaching, but also the supreme government of the whole Church were assigned, has indeed continually adhered 'to the same doctrine, in the same sense, and in the same mind'."

Application of this teaching:
The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult cannot be in accord with this instruction from Pope Pius XIII because they are a heretical society, and other groups that offer Catholic looking liturgy ("sspx" , "sspv", "cmri", "Thuc line", other "independents", etc.) are not because they are in heresy against the Sources of Dogma which address Catholic Jurisdiction and Governance.



Pope Pius IX, Graves Ac Diuturnae, Paragraph 4, 23 March 1875 >
"They (the faithful) should totally shun their religious celebrations, their buildings, and their chairs of pestilence which they have with impunity established (...) They should shun their writings and all contact with them. They should not have any dealings or meetings with usurping priests and apostates from the faith who dare to exercise the duties of an ecclesiastical minister without possessing a legitimate mission or any Jurisdiction. They should avoid them as strangers and thieves who come only to steal, slay, and destroy. For the Church's children should consider the proper action to preserve the most precious treasure of faith, without which it is impossible to please God."

Application of this teaching:
This citation applies to the vatican-2 heretic cult which was founded on 8 December 1965 at the Vatican and ... to every other group in the world who offers a Catholic looking liturgy because all of these other groups are in violation of the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.



S u b - p a r t    D

The "cmri" is in heresy against the Water Baptism Dogma, grinding it under their heels.

~     ~     ~

1.  Once again the "cmri" proves themselves to be a non-Catholic cult. This time by rejecting the Dogma on Water Baptism.

2.  Rejecting the Dogma on Water Baptism, just as the rejection of any Dogma, causes your automatic excommunication. Participation in a cult that rejects the Water Baptism Dogma causes your own automatic excommunication ... as physical participation in any heretical society does.

3.  The "cmri" , on their heretic website, engages in the very old lie of citing "references" from individual persons who discuss "baptism of desire" and the "cmri" acts as if these writings of individuals can override Sources of Dogma of the Pope in union with the bishops of the world. Writings of individuals (the Ordinary Magisterium) cannot contradict the Solemn Magisterium (Sources of Dogma definitions). Also, modern (heretic) publishers (none of whom are Catholic) cannot be trusted, the Church teaches to reject the works of heretics.



Sources of Dogma which rule out "baptism of desire" and "baptism of blood" ... being rejected by the "cmri" non-Catholic cult:
(The below Dogma proves that there is one type of Baptism for remitting Original Sin ... not  "three"  (no  "baptism of desire"  or  "baptism of blood")
 
~   ~

Council of Chalcedon, Pope Saint Leo the Great, Letter to Flavian (martyr) section, 451 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"For there are three who give testimony – Spirit and water and blood. And the three are one. In other words, the Spirit of Sanctification and the Blood of Redemption and the water of baptism. These three are one and remain indivisible. None of them is separable from its link with the others."

Note 1: The Spirit of Sanctification (Justification) is inseparable from water baptism (they are "one"). No one is justified without water baptism and so no one can enter Heaven without water baptism. The reference to Blood here is the Blood of the Passion which, now, gives the power to the water to remit Original Sin in a properly performed baptism.

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.

Note 3: Saint Flavian was Bishop of Constantinople and a Catholic martyr, he died in 449 A.D. ... the Letter to Flavian was promulgated as part of the Council of Chalcedon text (thereby making it Dogmatic) two years after Saint Flavian was martyred.



Council of Florence, Pope Eugene IV, Session 8, Exultate Deo, 22 Nov 1439 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Holy baptism holds the first place among all the sacraments, for it is the gate of the spiritual life; through it we become members of Christ and of the body of the Church. Since death came into the world through one person, unless we are born again of water and the Spirit, we cannot, as Truth says, enter the Kingdom of Heaven. The matter of this sacrament is real and natural water."

Note: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Fourth Lateran Council, Constitution 1 - Profession of Faith, Paragraph 3, 1215 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"But the sacrament of baptism is consecrated in water at the invocation of the undivided Trinity -- namely Father, Son and Holy Spirit -- and brings salvation to both children and adults when it is correctly carried out by anyone in the form laid down by the Church. If someone falls into sin after having received baptism, he or she can always be restored through true penitence."

Note 1: If you believe baptism can be consecrated in "desire" or "blood" ... you're in a heretical state, automatically excommunicated, and headed for Hell.

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.

Note 3: Regarding the text: "and brings salvation" ... after one is baptized into the Church he must remain in the Church by not falling into heresy. If one falls into heresy or participation in a heretic cult ("lutheran", "vatican-2", "methodist", "evangelical", etc.) after baptism ... he would make an Abjuration as seen on Section 19.1 of this site to re-enter the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church does not have any buildings at this time (see Sections 12 through 21).

Note 4: Please see Sections 10.1, 10.2, and 29 regarding penitence after falling into sin after baptism.



Council of Trent, Session 5, Decree Concerning Original Sin, Paragraph 4, 1546 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Even infants, who could not as yet commit any sin of themselves, are for this cause truly baptized for the remission of sins, that in them that may be cleansed away by regeneration, which they have contracted by generation. For, unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God."

Note 1: Again, regeneration from Original Sin, only through water baptism.

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.

Note 3: This Source of Dogma highlights the "baptism of desire" fraud from another perspective. Infants cannot desire baptism, they must be baptized in water.



Council of Trent, Session 5, Decree Concerning Original Sin, Paragraph 4, 1546 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"If any one denies, that infants, newly born from their mother's wombs ... has need of being expiated by the laver of regeneration for the obtaining (of) life everlasting ... let him be anathema."

Note 1: The "laver of regeneration" is water baptism ... for obtaining life everlasting.

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.

Note 3: This Source of Dogma highlights the "baptism of desire" fraud from another perspective. Infants cannot desire baptism, they must be baptized in water.



Council of Trent, Session 7, Baptism Section, Canon 2, 1547 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"If any one saith, that true and natural water is not of necessity for baptism, and, on that account, wrests, to some sort of metaphor, those words of our Lord Jesus Christ; Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost; let him be anathema."

Note: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Council of Trent, Session 14, Chapter 2, On the Most Holy Sacraments of Penance and Extreme Unction, 1551 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Seeing that the Church exercises judgment on no one who has not entered therein through the gate of baptism. For, what have I, saith the apostle, to do to judge them that are without? It is otherwise with those who are of the household of the faith, whom Christ our Lord has once, by the laver of baptism, made the members of His own body."

Note 1: The "laver of baptism" is water ... to be made members of His own body.

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Council of Trent, Session 21, Chapter 4, That little Children are not bound to sacramental Communion, 1562 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Finally, this same holy Synod teaches, that little children, who have not attained to the use of reason, are not by any necessity obliged to the sacramental communion of the Eucharist: forasmuch as, having been regenerated by the laver of baptism, and being incorporated with Christ, they cannot, at that age, lose the grace which they have already acquired of being the sons of God."

Note 1: The "laver of baptism" is water ... brings about regeneration and incorporation into Christ.

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Pope Boniface VIII, Unam Sanctam, 18 Nov 1302 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"One is my dove, my perfect one ... which represents the one mystical body whose head is Christ, of Christ indeed, as God. And in this, 'one Lord, one faith, one baptism'."

Note 1: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



The Nicene Constantinople Creed, 381 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"We confess one baptism for the remission of sins."

Note 1: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Council of Trent, Session 3, Decree touching the Symbol of Faith, 4 Feb 1546 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"I confess one baptism for the remission of sins; and I look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come."

Note 1: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Council of Trent, Session 6, Decree on Justification, 1547 A.D., Chapters 5, 6, 7 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
(5) "The Synod furthermore declares, that in adults, the beginning of the said Justification is to be derived from the prevenient grace of God, through Jesus Christ ... yet is he not able, by his own free will, without the grace of God, to move himself unto justice in His sight ..."

(6) "Now they (adults) ... are therefore moved against sins by a certain hatred and detestation, to wit, by that penitence which must be performed before baptism: lastly, when they purpose to receive baptism, to begin a new life, and to keep the commandments of God."

(7) "Of this Justification the causes are these:
The final cause indeed is the glory of God ...
The meritorious cause is His most beloved only-begotten, our Lord Jesus Christ ...
The instrumental cause is the sacrament of baptism, which is the sacrament of faith ..."

Note 1: Even though the person is moved to a hatred of sin and has the interior purpose to receive baptism in Paragraph (6) ... and has a penitence (remorse for sin) before baptism ... even so, in accordance with the Water Baptism Dogma he doesn't reach justification until the instrumental cause -- the sacrament of baptism as is seen in Paragraph 7.

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Council of Trent, Session 6, Canons on Justification, Canon 1, 1547 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"If any one saith, that man may be justified before God by his own works, whether done through the teaching of human nature, or that of the law, without the grace of God through Jesus Christ; let him be anathema."

Note 1: The interior disposition or desire of the person -- "his own works" -- does not bring the soul to a justified state without the grace of Jesus Christ. The sanctifying grace, through Jesus Christ, to bring one to justification has been dogmatically defined as water baptism.

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Pope Clement V, Council of Vienne, Decree 30, 1311-1312 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Since however there is for both regulars and seculars, for superiors and subjects, for exempt and non-exempt, one universal Church, outside of which there is no salvation, for all of whom there is one Lord, one faith, and one baptism ..."

Note 1: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Pope Pius IV, Council of Trent, Iniunctum nobis, Profession of Faith, 13 Nov 1565 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"I confess one baptism for the remission of sins, and I await the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come."

Note 1: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Vatican Council of 1870, Session 2, Profession of Faith -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"I confess one baptism for the remission of sins."

Note 1: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Council of Trent, Session 5, Decree Concerning Original Sin, Paragraph 3, 1546 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"If any one asserts, that this sin of Adam ... is taken away either by the powers of human nature, or by any other remedy than the merit of the one mediator, our Lord Jesus Christ ... or if he denies that the said merit of Jesus Christ is applied, both to adults and to infants, by the sacrament of baptism ... let him be anathema."

Note 1: Removal of Orignal Sin by the "powers of human nature" is specifically denied in this decree ... such as the human nature action of "desire".

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Council of Trent, Session 6, Decrees on Justification, Chapter 4, 1547 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"And this translation, since the promulgation of the Gospel, cannot be effected, without the laver of regeneration, or the desire thereof, as it is written; unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Ghost, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God."

Note 1: The Council of Trent, Session 6, Chapter 4 does not teach the heresy of "baptism of desire" as the non-Catholic vatican-2 cult claims. The Council was stating that neither the water nor the desire can be missing (the desire is actual grace).

Note 2: The heretics who that say Session 6, Chapter 4 teaches the heresy of "baptism of desire" actually reverse the words "the desire thereof" and add the word "baptism" to ... get their heresy of "baptism of desire" ... when the text says no such thing.

Note 3: At this time the Church was fighting against heresies on justification. There was heresy that people were justified only by receiving actual grace, which moves you away from sin, but actual grace doesn't on its own place you into a justified state. Only water baptism places you into a justified state. This is why the Council went out of its way to word Chapter 4 like it did ... to inform people that two things must take place (1) actual grace (the desire) and then (2) the Sacrament of water baptism -- neither one can be missing to place you into the justified state.

Note 4: Please see Section 7.3 of this site which addressed Session 6, Chapter 4 in more detail.

Note 5: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



Council of Trent, Session 6, Canons on Justification, Canon 9, 1547 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"If any one saith, that by faith alone the impious is justified; in such wise as to mean, that nothing else is required to co-operate in order to the obtaining the grace of Justification, and that it is not in any way necessary, that he be prepared and disposed by the movement of his own will; let him be anathema."

Note 1: One must cooperate with the actual graces received and take the only action which brings one to the state of justification ... which is brought about by the sanctifying grace of water baptism.

Note 2: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.



De Fide Catholic Dogma, Dogma Section IX, Dogma No. 2 >
"The materia remota for the Sacrament of Baptism is true and natural water."

Note 1: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".

Note 2: The phrase "materia remota" (remote material) is used here by the Church because the heretics were saying that if water (the proximate matter) is not available then you can use a remote matter as a substitute for water. By the Church using the phrase "materia remota" it is saying that the remote matter for baptism is also water -- thereby specifying water in all cases against the heretics.



De Fide Catholic Dogma, Dogma Section IX, Dogma No. 6 >
"Baptism by water (Baptismus fluminis) is, since the promulgation of the Gospel, necessary for all men without exception for salvation."

Note: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".



Council of Valence III, Canon 5, 855 A.D. >
"Likewise we believe that we must hold most firmly that all the multitude of the faithful, regenerated 'from the water and the Holy Spirit', and through this truly incorporated in the Church."

Note: Again, regeneration from Original Sin, only through water baptism.



Council of Toledo XI, 675 A.D. >
"We believe that the holy Catholic Church, purchased by the price of His blood, will reign with Him for eternity. Established in her bosom we believe in and confess one baptism for the remission of all sins."

Note: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".



Pope Saint Gregory II, 715-731 A.D. >
"And let that which the Apostle says be observed: One God, one faith, one baptism."

Note: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".



Pope St. Leo IX, Congratulamur Vehementer, 13 Apr 1053 >
"I believe that the one true Church is holy, Catholic and apostolic, in which is given one baptism and the true remission of all sins."

Note: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".



Pope Pius VI, Inscrutabile, Paragraph 8, 25 Dec 1775 >
"We exhort and advise you to be all of one mind and in harmony as you strive for the same object, just as the Church has one faith, one baptism, and one Spirit."

Note: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".



Pope Leo XII, Ubi Primum, Paragraph 14, 5 May 1824 >
"By it we are taught, and by divine faith we hold one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and that no other name under Heaven is given to men except the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth in which we must be saved. This is why we profess that there is no salvation outside the Church."

Note: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".



Pope Pius VIII, Traditi Humilitati, Paragraph 4, 24 May 1829 >
"Against these experienced sophists the people must be taught that the profession of the Catholic faith is uniquely true, as the apostle proclaims: one Lord, one faith, one baptism."

Note: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".



Pope Pius IX, Singular quadem, 9 Dec 1854 >
"Let us hold most firmly that, in accordance with Catholic teaching, there is 'one God, one faith, one baptism', it is unlawful to proceed further in inquiry."

Note: One baptism not three ... no "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood".



Warning:  Given the above Sources of Dogma ... whoever says or believes that there is "baptism of desire" or "baptism of blood" ... or whoever participates in reprobate organizations that teach these heresies is ... most certainly automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church.



S u b - p a r t    E

The "cmri" cult continuously promotes the heresy of "supplied jurisdiction" ... they must push this lie for their very existence.

~     ~     ~

As seen in Sub-part A above, there is one and only one source of Catholic Jurisdiction in the world. This one source of Jurisdiction is under the See of Peter (not in place or operative at this time), it is hierarchal, and it governs the entire Church around the whole world - these are Dogmatic facts which we must believe to get to Heaven.

So where did the man-made concept of "supplied jurisdiction" come from. Where did the notion come from that the people "supply Jurisdiction" to clerics in "times of emergency" or the Church somehow "supplies Jurisdiction" in a way which is in violation of the Jurisdiction and governance Dogma cited above? This is the question answered by the research below.



There is a complete absence of this fiction of "supplied jurisdiction" in the formal Catholic writings and in the Denzinger, Sources of Catholic Dogma

An electronic search (of MS-word files) of the Catholic Church General Council writings and of the Denzinger Sources of Catholic Dogma revealed that "supplied jurisdiction" is absolutely nowhere in Council writings, and nowhere in the Denzinger Sources of Catholic Dogma ... there is not a single occurrence in any of the Church’s official (Dogmatic) teaching.

The writings of the Catholic world-wide Councils do not have a single instance of this ... non-Catholic fiction >

We placed the Catholic Council texts (20 Councils) into a single MS-word file which ran to 538 pages and proceeded to do searches on this subject in the following manner with the following results:

Searched on   -->   "supplied jurisdiction"   -->   not a single occurance
Searched on   -->   "supplies jurisdiction"   -->   not a single occurance
Searched on   -->   "Jurisdiction is supplied by the Church"   -->   not a single occurance
Searched on   -->   "the Church supplies jurisdiction"   -->   not a single occurance
Searched on   -->   "Church supplies jurisdiction"   -->   not a single occurance



The Denzinger - Sources of Catholic Dogma doesn't have a single instance of this ... non-Catholic fiction >

The Denzinger is organized by numbered articles. There are 2333 (two thousand, three hundred, and thirty three) numbered articles in the Denzinger which documents writings and teachings of Catholic Councils, Popes, and Saints. We placed the entire Denzinger into a single MS-word file which ran to 408 pages and proceeded to do searches on this subject in the following manner with the following results:

Searched on   -->   "supplied jurisdiction"   -->   not a single occurance
Searched on   -->   "supplies jurisdiction"   -->   not a single occurance
Searched on   -->   "Jurisdiction is supplied by the Church"   -->   not a single occurance
Searched on   -->   "the Church supplies jurisdiction"   -->   not a single occurance
Searched on   -->   "Church supplies jurisdiction"   -->   not a single occurance



Search Summary >
A total of 946 pages of the formal Catholic teachings were searched, with five different types of searches, so that 4,730 pages were checked using the above search criteria. If "supplied jurisdiction" was the teaching of the Catholic Church it most certainly would have to be addressed and its parameters defined in these Catholic writings -- at least once -- somewhere.



"Supplied jurisdiction" is nowhere in formal Catholic teaching, so where did it come from? It came from man-made "canon law" of 1917 (heresies of this "canon law" is listed on Section 105.3), which cannot be used to go against the Divine Law on Jurisdiction and Governance. Setting aside for a moment that the "1917 code" is heresy ... "canon law" can only support and defend the Divine Law. If a "canon law" goes against the Divine Law it must be regarded as heresy. There is a hierarchy of laws.

The above search result, and the fact that the whole concept of a "supplied jurisdiction" … is against the Catholic Sources of Dogma which address Jurisdiction and Governance, we can see clearly that "supplied jurisdiction" is a non-Catholic fiction and hoax. Since it isn’t Catholic it must, by definition, be from Hell for the damnation of human souls.



Since the "supplied jurisdiction" myth is completely opposed to the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance as seen in Sub-part C ... and based on not finding "supplied jurisdiction" in the official writings of the Catholic Church, it is clear that any organization functioning via "supplied jurisdiction" is in heresy against the Jurisdiction Dogma, and cannot be a Catholic entity.

Since "supplied jurisdiction" is against the Dogma, any "canon law" that discusses or uses the concept of "supplied jurisdiction" is heresy and not Catholic teaching.

It must already have been conceded that the concept of "supplied jurisdiction" is heresy based on the Sources of Dogma cited in Sub-part C of this packet, but just the same, it was instructive to run the above searches of the Catholic writings.

Note:
We are all aware of the instances where priests secretly went into England to bring the Sacraments to the English who had lost their local hierarchy to the "anglican" heresy. The Catholic priests who did this did have jurisdiction through their bishops in France (who sent them) -- these bishops in turn had their Jurisdiction from the Pope. Similar situations have probably happened in Church history ... but situations like that of the "anglican" heresy ... cannot be used to justify setting up Catholic looking liturgies against the Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma.

We have to face the facts in the supernatural order ... God has allowed the Mass to be taken away by the vatican-2 jew-heretic cult. If we insist on setting up or attending non-jurisdictional Catholic looking liturgies we cause our automatic excommunication ... for participating in non-Catholic "worship".



Pope Pius X started a commission to standardize the Church's Canon Law on 19 March 1904. Pius X died in 1914. If you take a look at the heresies in the encyclicals of "Benedict XV" (in Section 20) starting right away in 1914, you can understand why the heresy of "supplied jurisdiction" (and other heresies) are in the "1917 code". Non-Catholic apostate "cardinal" Gasparri was the architect of the "1917 code". Gasparri produced a non-Catholic "code" under the direction of his fellow heretic anti-Pope "Benedict XV" (1914-1922) -- both of these men are in Hell, they did not publically abjure of their publically promulgated heresy before they died. Privately held heresy also causes you automatic excommunication from the Catholic Church. Again, selected heresies of anti-Pope "Benedict XV" are listed on Section 20 of this site.



S u b - p a r t    F

The "cmri" is lying about Epikeia (Canonical Equity). Epikeia can only be used against man-made law,
it cannot be used against Divine Law (the Dogma) on Jurisdiction and Governance.

~     ~     ~

1.  The term Epikeia (also referred to as "Canonical Equity") means to not keep to the letter of the law in "times of emergency" or not keeping to the letter of the law for the sake of justice.

2.  Epikeia can only be used against man-made law and discipline it cannot be used against the Divine Law (the Catholic Dogma) on any subject.

3.  We cannot violate the Catholic Dogma at any time, including "times of emergency" and get to Heaven. There is no such thing as an emergency with God which "permits" us to go against the Divine Law (the Dogma) on Jurisdiction and Governance.

4.  If God, in His perfect will, takes the Mass away, which He did in 1965 by allowing the vatican-2 jew-heretic cult to take over our Catholic properties, then we cannot declare "Epikeia!" and reject the Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma.

5.  All of the definitions of epikeia in Catholic Dictionaries and as discussed by Catholic sources say that epikeia relates to and is applied to man-made laws not Divine Law.

6.  The first definition shown below specifically states that epikeia cannot be used regarding Divine Law. Epikeia cannot excuse anyone from not keeping to the letter of the law when the subject at hand is addressed by Catholic Dogma.

7.  The true definitions of epikeia are shown below so that you can see that the "cmri" is lying about this, also.



The True Definitions of Epikeia:
(You can re-verify these definitions of epikeia yourself from your sources)

 
~   ~

(1)  Catholic Encyclopedia, compiled by Robert C. Broderick >
"Epikeia: This Greek term, meaning equity, is applied to the interpretation of a law. It is reasonably taken for granted that the lawgiver does not wish to bind in some particularly difficult case because the exercise of the law would work an unforeseen hardship; thus there is an examination of the law and a judgment of the intent of the lawgiver in the spirit of the law but against its rigor in application. Epikeia may not be used in the following cases: when the lawgiver may be approached directly for an interpretation or dispensation; ... in the case of Divine Law, positive or natural; or where the lawgiver could not oblige ..."   (Page 190-191, Copyright 1976)



(2)  "The History, Nature, & Use of Epikeia in Moral Theology" >
"The reasons for the existence of such a concept (epikeia) is to be found in the fact that laws are, of their very nature, universal. Lawmakers legislate for the general run of cases, and not for any particular concrete instance. But particular details and circumstance are almost limitless in number and nature; it is clear that no legislator in the act of framing of a law, can foresee all the variable circumstances which may arise. Taking into account what usually and ordinarily happens, he enacts his law."   (Fr. Lawrence Joseph Riley, A.B. S.T.L , 7 May 1948)



(3)  Concise Catholic Dictionary >
"An interpretation of a law whereby it is considered not to bind in a particular case because of some special circumstances; an interpretation of the law in a particular instance against the letter of the law but in keeping with its spirit; an interpretation of the mind of the lawmaker which reasons that he, knowing the conditions, would not wish his law to bind in this particular case."   (Bruce Publishing Company, Milwaukee, 1944 compiled by Robert Broderick)



(4)  Saint Thomas Aquinas, regarding epikeia >
"When we were treating of laws, since human actions, with which laws are concerned, are composed of contingent singulars and are innumerable in their diversity, it was not possible to lay down rules of law that would apply to every single case. Legislators in framing laws attend to what commonly happens: although if the law be applied to certain cases it will frustrate the equality of justice and be injurious to the common good, which the law has in view."   (Summa, 2nd Part of the 2nd Part, Question 120, Article 1, Answer)



(5)  Catholic Encyclopedia >
"When the law of the legislator is not in harmony with the dictates of the natural law, equity (æquitas, epikeia) demands that it be set aside or corrected. St. Thomas explains the lawfulness of this procedure. Because human actions, which are the subject of laws are individual and innumerable, it is not possible to establish any law that may not sometimes work out unjustly."



(6)  New Catholic Dictionary, 1910 Version >
"An indulgent and benign interpretation of law, which regards a law as not applying in a particular case because of circumstances unforeseen by the lawmaker. The lawmaker cannot foresee all possible cases that may come under the law, and it is therefore reasonably presumed that were the present circumstances known to the legislator he would permit the act."



(7)  St. Thomas Aquinas, regarding epikeia >
"No man is so wise as to be able to take account of every single case; wherefore he is not able sufficiently to express in words all those things that are suitable for the end he has in view."   (Summa, 1st Part of the 2nd Part, Question 96, Article 6, R.O. 3)



One can see from the definitions of epikeia, that it applies to human legislation and not the Divine Law, using phrases like:

     "the lawgiver does not wish to bind"
     "epikeia may not be used … in the case of Divine Law"
     "not foreseen by the legislator"
     "interprets the mind of the lawgiver"
     "no legislator … can foresee all"
     "taking into account what usually and ordinarily happens"
     "no man has wisdom … all individual cases"
       etc.

Epikeia has no application relative to the Divine Law (the Catholic Dogmas) which must be held with no exceptions, to save your soul.

It is clear that epikeia addresses not keeping to the letter of the law for man-made legislation … where unforeseen circumstances might introduce an injustice if one were to keep to the letter of the law. Also epikeia covers for exceptions since man-made legislation tries to address what commonly happens, man-made law cannot account for all occurrences because the legislation itself would be virtually endless and unworkable.

Epikeia has no application whatsoever regarding the Divine Law, the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.

The vatican-2 cult founded in 1965 at the Vatican promotes well over 200 heresies in the vatican-2 documents and heresy in their many other writings, speeches, and actions. The non-Catholic vatican-2 cult clearly cannot provide Catholic Jurisdiction since they are not Catholic by Faith and are therefore automatically excommunicated. See Sections 12 through 21 of this website.

We are mandated by Catholic Dogma to physically leave this cult since it is a heretical society which strenuously enforces their heresy on our formerly Catholic properties ... the vatican-2 group leaders who are dressed like and play-act as Catholic priests make sure that the Catholic Dogma is nowhere in site on our formerly Catholic properties.

Given the loss of our property to the vatican-2 cult, we cannot cry out "epikeia" and establish Catholic looking liturgies, which violate the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and governance … this causes the loss of our soul.

We had been going to "independent chapels" ourselves until we saw clearer, via the Dogma and proper understanding of epikeia, that we were committing sins against the Faith by going to them after we had left the vatican-2 cult. A Formal Abjuration for leaving the vatican-2 and "cmri" cults and re-entering the Catholic Church is on Section 19.1 of this website.

Given: The Divine Law regarding Jurisdiction and Governance, combined with the state of things (the takeover of our property by non-Catholics) at the Vatican and in the formerly Catholic diocese around the world ... it is clear that God has allowed the Mass, sacramental confession, and the priesthood to be taken away from us in these times.



S u b - p a r t    G

The "cmri" is in heresy by "teaching" that man-made canon law can override the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.

~     ~     ~

1.  There are two sets of laws in the world, Divine Law (the Catholic Dogma) and man-made law such as civil laws (the man-made "canon laws" are heresy and were issued by heretics).

2.  The "cmri" is illegally and illicitly using "canon law" paragraphs to stay in violation of the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.

3.  Section 105.1 shows the detail on how the "cmri" is illegally using canon law to violate the Jurisdiction Dogma. Relatedly, shown in Section 105.2 of this website, is the fact that the "canon law" promulgated by heretic anti-Pope "Benedict XV" has heretical "canons".

4.  We'll cite here a few citations that you must keep the Dogma of the Faith to be in the Church ... you cannot use "canon law" to go against any Catholic Dogma such as the Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.



Selected Catholic Dogma and Citations that you must keep to the Dogmas to be Catholic
(Please see Sections 5.1 and 9 of this website for many more related citations)
 
~   ~

Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Session 8, 22 Nov 1439 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Whoever wills to be saved, before all things it is necessary that he holds the Catholic faith. Unless a person keeps this faith whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish eternally."



Vatican Council of 1870, Pope Pius IX, Session 2, Profession of Faith -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"This true Catholic Faith, outside of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold, is what I shall steadfastly maintain and confess, by the help of God, in all its completeness and purity until my dying breath, and I shall do my best to ensure that all others do the same. This is what I, the same Pius, promise, vow and swear."



Vatican Council of 1870, Pope Pius IX, Session 3, Chapter 3 On Faith, Paragraphs 8-9 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Wherefore, by Divine and Catholic Faith all those things are to be believed which are contained in the word of God as found in scripture and tradition, and which are proposed by the Church as matters to be believed as Divinely revealed (...) Since, then, without Faith it is impossible to please God and reach the fellowship of his sons and daughters, it follows that no one can ever achieve justification without it, neither can anyone attain eternal life unless he or she perseveres in it to the end."



Vatican Council of 1870, Pope Pius IX, Session 3, Chapter 3, Paragraph 1 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Since human beings are totally dependent on God as their Creator and Lord, and created reason is completely subject to uncreated truth, we are obliged to yield to God the Revealer full submission of intellect and will by faith."



The beginning of the Athanasius Creed, c. 370 A.D. -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Whosoever will be saved, before all things it is necessary that he hold the Catholic Faith. Which Faith except everyone do keep whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish everlastingly."



Pope Saint Leo the Great, Doctor of the Church >
"The faith shall never vary in any age, for one is the faith which justifies the Just of all ages. It is unlawful to differ even by a single word from apostolic doctrine."



Pope Benedict XIV, Cum Religiosi (On Catechesis), Paragraph 4, 26 June 1754 >
"See to it that every minister performs carefully the measures laid down by the holy Council of Trent and by the statutes of your synods: that on fixed days school-masters and mistresses should teach Christian doctrine; that confessors should perform this part of their duty whenever anyone stands at their tribunal who does not know what he must by necessity of means know to be saved."



Pope Pius X, Acerbo Nimis, 15 April 1905, Paragraphs 2, 26 >
"And so Our Predecessor, Benedict XIV, had just cause to write: 'We declare that a great number of those who are condemned to eternal punishment suffer that everlasting calamity because of ignorance of those mysteries of faith which must be known and believed in order to be numbered among the elect.' (...) These truths, indeed, far surpass the natural understanding of the people, yet must be known by all - the uneducated and the cultured - in order that they may arrive at eternal happiness."



Pope Pius IX, Qui Pluribus, 9 Nov 1846, paragraph 19 >
"You must also care for and defend the Catholic faith with episcopal strength and see that the flock entrusted to you stands to the end firm and unmoved in the faith. For unless one preserves the faith entire and uninjured, he will without doubt perish forever."



S u b - p a r t    H

The "cmri" is lying that the Mass comes before the Dogmas of the Faith. The Faith comes before the Mass.
The "Mass" of the "cmri" is offered to a non-Catholic idol.

~     ~     ~

For those who still think that excommunicated heretic Thuc had performed valid consecrations of bishops ...

1.  The Sacraments of the Catholic Church are governed in accordance with the Dogma, the Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance. If this were not the case anyone could set up Catholic looking activities based on schismatic "ordinations".

2.  We are Catholic if we believe the Dogma and act in accordance with the Dogma ... including the Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance shown in Part (2). Keeping the entire Catholic Faith including acting in accordance with the Jurisdiction and Governance Dogma comes before the Mass ... otherwise we are not keeping the Catholic Faith, we lose our immortal souls and descend into Hell forever.

3.  There have been / are many groups around the world for the last 2000 years who had / have valid sacraments but God through the Church has instructed us to avoid them if they are connected to heresy. Non-jurisdictional groups that had / have valid sacraments also include the "anglican" heretics and the eastern "orthodox" who, like the "cmri" ", operate on a worldwide scale.

4.  God has no regard for non-Catholic "worship" ... that is, by any group that does not worship Him in truth and justice (i.e. according to the Dogma).



Selected Catholic Citations that the Faith comes before the Mass (Sacrifice).
 
~   ~

Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Ecclesiasticus 34:21-23 >
"The offering of him that sacrificeth of a thing wrongfully gotten, is stained, and the mockeries of the unjust are not acceptable. The Lord is only for them that wait upon Him in the way of truth and justice. The most High approveth not the gifts of the wicked: neither hath He respect to the oblations of the unjust, nor will He be pacified for sins by the multitude of their sacrifices."

Note 1: The "mockeries of the unjust" applies to the "cmri" cult because they deny the Water Baptism Dogma, the Jurisdiction Dogma, the Salvation Dogma, and the Automatic Excommunication Dogma of the Catholic Church. God sees the "sacrifice" of the "cmri" as the "gifts of the wicked".

Note 2: By denial of Catholic Dogma, the "cmri" is not "waiting on God in the way of truth and justice", so God ignores them, their "prayers" are not accepted.



Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Psalm 49:5 >
"Gather ye together His saints to Him: who set His covenant before sacrifices."

Note 1: God's covenant, the truth that He has revealed to men, is the dogmas of the Catholic Church. The "cmri" cult is in heresy against the Catholic Dogma so their "sacrifice" is not acceptable.



Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Osee 6:6 >
"I desired ... the knowledge of God more than holocausts."

Note: The knowledge of God, revealed to men to date, is the Catholic Dogmas. If you are in a building on Sunday which rejects the Catholic Dogma, you are doing something that is not pleasing to God.



Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Osee 3:4-5 >
"For the children of Israel shall sit many days without king, and without prince, and without sacrifice, and without altar, and without ephod, and without theraphim. And after this the children of Israel shall return … in the last days."

Note 1: The religion of the Old Testament Israelites was the Catholic Faith unfulfilled. The Catholic Church, unfulfilled, wrote the Old Testament and fulfilled wrote the New Testament. The "children of Israel" in this scripture are those who are properly baptized in water and who believe the Catholic dogmas.

Note 2: One can see from this scripture that the takeover of our Catholic buildings by the vatican-2 heretic cult in our time, is not the first time that the "children of Israel" have had to "sit without sacrifice".



Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Psalm 25:4-5 >
"I have not sat with the council of vanity: neither will I go in with the doers of unjust things. I have hated the assembly of the malignant; and with the wicked I will not sit."

Note: God does not "go in with the doers of unjust things" and hates false assemblies of the "cmri" cult which rejects Catholic Dogmas.



Pope Saint Pius V, 1566-1572 >
"Moreover, the Church alone has the legitimate worship of Sacrifice, and the salutary use of the Sacraments, which are efficacious instruments of Divine grace, used by God to produce true holiness. Hence, to possess true holiness, we must belong to this Church. (...) All other societies arrogating to themselves the name of "church", must necessarily, because guided by the spirit of the devil, be sunk in the most pernicious errors, both doctrinal and moral. (...) In Jerusalem only was it lawful to offer sacrifice to God, and in the Church of God only are to be found the true worship and true Sacrifice which can at all be acceptable to God."

Note: Since the "cmri" is a non-Catholic entity for being in violation of a host of Catholic Dogma (which they violate while looking very Catholic) this citation by Pope Saint Pius V applies to them.



Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of Psalm 1:1 >
"Blessed is the man who hath not walked in the counsel of the ungodly, nor stood in the way of sinners, nor sat in the chair of pestilence."

Note: The "counsel of the ungodly" is the counsel of any heretic cult, including the "cmri". The "chairs of pestilence" include the pews of the "cmri" heretic meeting halls. "Standing in the way of sinners" is standing with the "cmri" or any other heretic or apostate group.



Saint Bonaventure, Doctor of the Church, died 1274 A.D. >
"Once these conditions (intention and Orders) are present, the sacraments may be conferred by either the good or the wicked, the faithful or the heretical, within the Church or outside it: but within the Church, they are conferred both in fact and in effect, while outside it, although conferred in fact, they are not effective."

Note: This citation from Saint Bonaventure is a little bit of an understatement because a valid Mass outside of the Catholic Church is not offered to the Catholic God ... so by definition the Sacrifice is offered to demons. Also, the "cmri" has no bishops or priests to say Mass, since Thuc did not consecrate any bishops because he was excommunicated.



Pope Pius IX, Graves Ac Diuturnae, Paragraph 4, 23 March 1875 >
"They (the faithful) should totally shun their "religious" celebrations, their buildings, and their chairs of pestilence which they have with impunity established to "transmit" the sacred teachings. They should shun their writings and all contact with them. They should not have any dealings or meetings with usurping priests and apostates from the faith who dare to exercise the duties of an ecclesiastical "minister" without possessing a legitimate mission or any Jurisdiction."

Note 1: The "cmri" heretic cult is hosting "chairs of pestilence" with a Catholic looking liturgy, which we are instructed here to shun.

Note 2: The "cmri" and other heretic groups lack "legitimate mission and jurisdiction" because Christ only founded the Catholic Church.

Note 3: Heretics are not "transmitting the sacred teachings" (which is the Catholic Dogmas) they are transmitting their man-made fables - various heresies against the Catholic truths such as the Governance and Jurisdiction Dogma.

Note 4: There is no Catholic jurisdiction or governance in the world today, it simply does not exist.



Wings of Eagles >
"Before Campion and his associates began to preach, Catholics had often compromised with protestantism (heretics) ... Campion preached ... bold and uncompromising. Catholics could not attend the 'protestant' services and retain their faith."

Note: Blessed Edmond Campion stating to not go into (in our time) the vatican-2 heretic "services".



Saint Athanasius, Doctor of the Church, died 373 A.D. >
"Saint Anthony (Of the Desert) never held communion with the Meletian schismatic, knowing their wickedness and rebellion from the beginning, nor had friendly converse with the Manicheans, nor any other heretics, save only to warn them to return to their duty, believing and teaching that their friendship and society was a harm and ruin to the soul, still also he loathed the "arian" heresy and taught all neither to go near them nor partake in their ill-faith."

Note: The ill-faith, in our times not to attend, includes the "cmri" heretic meeting halls and any other heretic or apostate group.



Saint Ignatius of Antioch, died c. 107 A.D. >
"It is fitting, therefore, that you keep aloof from such persons, and neither in private nor in public speak to them. But flee from all abominable heresies and those who cause schism ... Brethren, do not be deceived. If any man follows him who separates from the truth, he shall not inherit the kingdom of God; and if any man does not stay away from the preacher of falsehood, he shall be condemned to Hell ... If anyone walks according to a foreign doctrine, he is not of Christ, nor a partaker of His passion. Have no fellowship with such a man, lest you perish along with him, even though he should be your father, your son, your brother, or a member of your family."

Note: In our time this would be a warning to avoid the "cmri" heretic meeting halls and any other heretic or apostate group.



Catholic writing of Romans 16:17 >
"Now I beseech you, brethren, to mark them who make dissensions and offences contrary to the doctrine which you have learned, and avoid them."

Note: Another clear warning to avoid the "cmri" heretic meeting halls which have relentless "dissensions and offences contrary" to the Catholic Dogma.



Catholic writing of 1 Corinthians 5:11 >
"But now I have written to you, not to keep company, if any man ... be ... a server of idols."

Note: Those in "cmri" meeting halls are servers of idols ... their "cmri" "god" is a man-made fable and idol (which rejects Catholic Dogma) was invented by the "cmri".



Catholic Faith (pre-fulfillment) writing of 1 Kings 15:22-23 >
"And Samuel said: Doth the Lord desire holocausts and victims, and not rather that the voice of the Lord should be obeyed? For obedience is better than sacrifices: and to hearken rather than to offer the fat of rams. Because it is like the sin of witchcraft to rebel: and like the crime of idolatry, to refuse to obey."

Note 1: The "cmri" heretic cult clearly does not obey the voice of God as is specified in 1 Kings 15. They are strenuously rebelling against the Catholic Dogma to damn souls. If you doubt this, try to hand out a sheet with the Catholic Dogma regarding water baptism on it (such as is on Section 7.2 of this website) and see how fast you are stopped by the "cmri" heretic group leader who is dressed up like a Catholic priest.

Note 2: If you disagree with God’s teaching that Faith comes before sacrifice, please re-read 1 Kings 15:22-23.



Pope Eugene IV, Council of Basel, Session 20, 22 Jan 1435, Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"... nobody shall be obliged to abstain from communion with anyone in the administration and reception of sacraments or in any other sacred or profane matters, ... unless ... it is clear that someone has incurred a sentence of excommunication with such notoriety that it cannot be concealed or in any way excused in law." Note: The "cmri" heretic cult is clearly notorious, obvious, and manifest in their heresies against the Catholic Dogma ... as is the vatican-2 cult which on 8 December 1965 took over our formerly Catholic properties.



S u b - p a r t    I

The "cmri" is in heresy against the Catholic Salvation Dogma, including saying that "ignorance" saves.

~     ~     ~

1.  Water baptism is the only entrance to the Catholic Church, which is the only way to get to Heaven. By the "cmri" denying the Dogma on Water Baptism, they by definition deny the Salvation Dogma.

2.  By the "cmri" rejecting the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance, they are implying that there is Salvation outside of the Catholic Church. This is a rejection of the Salvation Dogma.

3.  By the "cmri" saying that "ignorance" or "invincible ignorance" is a loophole by which non-Catholics can get to Heaven, they are rejecting the Catholic Salvation Dogma. The heresy that "ignorance saves" has been condemned over and over in Catholic Sources of Dogma, a great many listed on Section 5.1 of this site, such as ...



Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, Session 8, 22 Nov 1439 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Whoever wills to be saved, before all things it is necessary that he holds the Catholic faith. Unless a person keeps this faith whole and undefiled, without doubt he shall perish eternally."

Note 1: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.

Note 2: Those who are falsely called "material heretics" are not, by this Source of Dogma, in a justified state since they do not keep the faith whole and inviolate ... since "they just don't know". So they are not in a state where they can get to Heaven, to say otherwise is heresy.



Vatican Council of 1870, Pope Pius IX, Session 2, Profession of Faith -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"This true Catholic Faith, outside of which none can be saved, which I now freely profess and truly hold, is what I shall steadfastly maintain and confess, by the help of God, in all its completeness and purity until my dying breath, and I shall do my best to ensure that all others do the same. This is what I, the same Pius, promise, vow and swear."

Note 1: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.

Note 2: Those who are falsely called "material heretics" are not, by this Source of Dogma, in a justified state since they do not keep the faith in all its completeness and purity ... since "they just don't know". So they are not in a state where they can get to Heaven, to say otherwise is heresy.



Vatican Council of 1870, Pope Pius IX, Session 3, Chapter 3 On Faith, Paragraphs 8-9 -- Ex-Cathedra Dogma >
"Wherefore, by Divine and Catholic Faith all those things are to be believed which are contained in the word of God as found in scripture and tradition, and which are proposed by the Church as matters to be believed as Divinely revealed (...) Since, then, without Faith it is impossible to please God and reach the fellowship of his sons and daughters, it follows that no one can ever achieve justification without it, neither can anyone attain eternal life unless he or she perseveres in it to the end."

Note 1: Ex-Cathedra ... the Pope in union with the Bishops of the world ... at a worldwide General Council.

Note 2: Those who are falsely called "material heretics" are not, by this Source of Dogma, in a justified state since they do not believe all those things that are to be believed ... since "they just don't know". So they are not in a state where they can get to Heaven, to say otherwise is heresy.

More on Section 5.1 of this site.



S u b - p a r t    J

God does not command impossibilities regarding the Sacraments ... Necessity of Means and Precept regarding the Sacraments

~     ~     ~

The Catholic teaching on Necessity of Means and Necessity of Precept
 
~   ~

The definitions:

Necessity of Means:
Is a necessity that is said to be absolutely necessary when without it a certain end cannot possibly be reached.

Necessity of Precept:
Is a necessity that is based on a positive precept, commanding something the omission of which, unless culpable, does not absolutely prevent the reaching of the end.



In terms of getting to Heaven, the Catholic Church teaches that all of the Sacraments of the Church are necessary by a necessity of precept except water baptism which is necessary by a necessity of means.

This means that if the sacraments (besides water baptism) are available to us we must receive them otherwise we are culpable for not doing so. As the definition states, omission of them because of non-availability does not prevent you from attaining the end (Heaven) unless you reject them when they are available.

God does not command impossibilities, He is fully aware of the fact that Mass and Sacramental Confession is not available in these times because of the Catholic Church losing its buildings to the vatican-2 jew-heretic cult in 1965 and that other organizations are not sources of the sacraments because they are all in violation of the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.

Does the non-availability of Mass and Confession mean we cannot be Catholic and we cannot get to Heaven? No it doesn’t.

Besides water baptism, the only other requirement which is necessary by a necessity of means (must have to get to Heaven) is believing all of the Catholic Dogmas (including the Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance) and Sources of Dogma. Section 7.4 of this site discusses necessity.

By the Church’s teaching on necessity, if you are baptized in water and believe the Catholic Dogmas you are in fact fully Catholic and have a chance of getting to Heaven when Mass and Sacramental Confession are not available ... if you are not in grave sin and have done sufficient charity.



S u b - p a r t    K

Summary and Required Catholic Remedy ... after involvement in the "cmri" cult

~     ~     ~

This summary is also the summary for the related Sections 105.1 and 105.2

1.  There is a hierarchy of laws in the world. There is man-made law and there is Divine Law. Man-made law such as "canon law" (shown to contain heresy, see Section 105.3) cannot be used to go against the Divine Law which addresses the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance.

2.  The concept of canonical equity (also called epikeia) of not keeping to the letter of law, only applies to man-made law, epikeia cannot be used to go against the Divine Law (the Dogma) ... the Catholic definitions of epikeia themselves say this. Epikeia can be used when an injustice would seem to be introduced if the letter of the man-made law or discipline is maintained. Clearly there is no such thing as "unforeseen circumstances" regarding Divine Law.

3.  The heresy and non-Catholic fraud of "supplied jurisdiction" has no application in the Catholic Kingdom of God. The heresy of "supplied jurisdiction" cannot have any application in violating the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance or obviously in any other "application" in the Catholic Church. The notion of "supplied jurisdiction" is nowhere in the writings of the Catholic General (worldwide) Councils and nowhere in the Denzinger, Sources of Catholic Dogma ... it is complete heresy against the Catholic Faith.

4.  Man-made "canon law" (shown to contain heresy, see Section 105.3) is being illicitly used and "explained" in ways which do not apply and cannot apply ... in order to violate the Divine Law, the Catholic Dogma on Jurisdiction and Governance. This is completely illicit no matter how many times the words "supplied jurisdiction" or "supplies jurisdiction" shows up in "canon law" or other writings.

5.  The architect of the "1917 Code" was "Cardinal" Gasparri (Cardinal is in quotes because Gasparri was automatically excommunicated for heresy because of the heresy he promoted in the code). Gasparri was shown by Mary Ball Martinez (liaison reporter at the Vatican for 15 years and author of "The Undermining of the Catholic Church") to be a subversive inside what used to be our Catholic buildings, working for anti-Pope "Benedict XV". Selected heresies of "Benedict XV" are listed on Section 20 of this site.

6.  The heresies of "Benedict XV" in his "encyclicals" reveals the heretical state of his soul. "Benedict XV" is the one responsible for the heresy of "supplied jurisdiction" (and other heresies) sent out in the "1917 code".

7.  Based on their violation of Catholic Dogma and the fact that they have no Catholic bishops or priests the "cmri"  does not offer Catholic Sacrifice to the Catholic God ... they are not a Catholic entity.

8.  Any sacrifice offered by a non-Catholic entity such as the "cmri"  is offered to a non-Catholic idol. Participation in such an act is highly displeasing to God and causes your automatic excommunication from the Catholic Church.



The Catholic Church’s canonically defined remedy to correct what has been brought about by the above listed heresy and deception is simple ... and is as follows:

1.  When we have knowingly or unknowingly been involved in a heretical society, or if we have fallen into heresy the Church has taught that we are to make a Formal Abjuration before two witnesses of ... the heresy or participation in a heretical society (or both). The Abjuration would normally be done before Catholic bishops or priests but since there aren’t any at this time we simply abjure before other witnesses since God does not command impossibilities.

2.  Following the Abjuration, the Church instructs us to make a Catholic Profession of Faith.

3.  Taking these two simple steps places your soul back into the Catholic Church. Since there is no forgiveness of sins outside the Catholic Church, once you Abjure (and enter the Church) you must make a general confession of any grave sins committed, see Sections 10.1 and 10.2 of this site.

4.  There is an Abjuration for this purpose on Section 19.1 of Immaculata-one.com which covers all of the heresies and participation in heretical societies that people are most likely in during these times. The Abjuration (19 page ms-word file) includes the Profession of Faith from the Council of Trent and Catholic citations regarding the requirement to Abjure.

5.  Keep Sunday Holy by praying the Mass prayers and the Rosary at home, do not engage in profaning Sunday by participating in non-Catholic "worship" in a vatican-2 cult meeting hall or in the meeting halls of the non-jurisdictional groups that offer Catholic looking ... non-Catholic liturgy.



S u b - p a r t    L

Additional "Thuc line" heretics who are not "cmri"  ... to which the above applies regarding Jurisdiction, and most likely the other heresies

~     ~     ~

Below are listed addtional "Thuc line" heretics ... who are running heretic meeting halls ... which includes playacting a non-Catholic, Catholic looking Mass.

1.  Excommunicated heretic ... who calls himself "Bishop Giles Bulter". Butler was not Ordained a Catholic priest on 16 September 1989, he was not consecrated a Bishop on 24 August 2005 ... he was simply installed as a heretic group leader of a secular (and soul damning) organization.
    > Heretic website: www.franciscanfathers.com
    > Location: Rochester NY, Waterloo NY, Waubeka WI, Fredonia WI, Radisson WI, Lubbock TX

This non-Catholic group maintains Tradition (as all similar heretic groups do) in practices and liturgy keeping to the traditional Mass rubrics ... but they do not maintain tradition in Dogma ... which is why they are all headed for Hell. This group is involved in an illegal and illicit "workaround" to the Catholic Church losing all of it's physical properties to the vatican-2 hreetic cult on 8 December 1965 (see Sectios 12 and 13 of this site).

2.  Excommunicated heretic ... who calls himself "Father Boneventure" ... of the group specified in Number 1. Bonaventure was not Ordained on 14 July 2010, he was simply installed as a group leader of a secular (and soul damning) organization.

3.  Excommunicated heretic ... who calls himself "Father Bernard" ... of the group specified in Number 1.

4.  Excommunicated heretic ... who calls himself "Father Joseph" ... of the group specified in Number 1.
    > Location: Lubbock TX

5.  Excommunicated heretic ... who calls himself "Monseñor Madrigal"
    > Heretic website: www.rexsumego.org.mx
    > Note: "Thuc line" meeting hall somewhere in Mexico ... tied in with Giles Butler's group.

6.  "Bishop Louis Vezelis" was a secular functionary of the group specified in Number 1 above ... until he descended into Hell forever on 1 January 2013. Vezelis (being automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church) did not consecrate as Bishops ... Giles Butler (on 24 August 2005), Luis Alberto Madrigal (on 12 December 2007), or Bonaventure Strandt (on 15 August 2012), they were simply installed as secular group leaders of their cult.

7. History of this fraud ... Vezelis was not consecrated a Catholic Bishop by George Musey on 24 August 1982 since Musey was not a Catholic Bishop. In turn Musey was not consecrated a Bishop by Moises Carmona since Carmona was not in the Catholic Church ... Carmona was not consecrated a Bishop on 17 October 1981 by the automatically excommunicated Thuc.

~ ~ ~ ~

<<< --- <<< --- <<< --- <<< ---  End Section 131  --- >>> --- >>> --- >>> --- >>>


Immaculate Heart of Mary    ~     Our Lady of Good Remedy    ~     Our Lady of La Salette    ~     Immaculate Heart of Mary
                         

~  Pray the Rosary for essential graces  ...  see Section 4.1 of this website for instructions  ~
~  Wear the Brown Scapular as the Blessed Virgin instructed us  ...  as Our Lady of Mount Carmel  ~

Selected prophesies of the Blessed Virgin  - & -  Quotes on being devoted to the Blessed Virgin.   (See also Section 4)
Ezechiel 44:2 > "This gate shall be shut … no man shall pass through it … the Lord the God of Israel hath entered in by it." Proverbs 8:35 > "He that shall find me (the Blessed Virgin), shall find life, and shall have salvation from the Lord."
St. Bonaventure, died 1274 > "No one ever finds Christ but with and through Mary. Whoever seeks Christ apart from Mary seeks Him in vain." Genesis 3:15 > "I will put enmities between thee and the woman, and thy seed and her seed: she shall crush thy head, and thou shalt lie in wait for her heel."
Ecclesiasticus 24:25 > "In me is all grace of the way and the truth, in me is all hope of life and virtue." St. Antoninus, died 1459 > "All graces that have ever been bestowed on men, all of them came through Mary."
St. John Damascene, died 749 > "Pure and Immaculate Virgin, save me and deliver me from eternal damnation." Wisdom 7:26 > "For she is the brightness of eternal light, and the unspotted mirror of God's majesty."
Ecclesiasticus 24:24 > "I am the mother of fair love, and of fear, and of knowledge, and of holy hope." St. Agnes, died 304 > "There is no one in the world who, if he asks for it, does not partake of the Divine mercy through the tenderness of Mary."
Proverbs 30:11-12 > "There is a generation that ... doth not bless their mother. A generation pure in their own eyes and yet not washed from their filthiness." Blessed John Eudes, died 1680 > "Every grace and blessing possessed by the Church, all the treasures of light, holiness, and glory that abide in her, on earth as well as in Heaven, all are due to the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary."
St. Athanasius, died 373 > "Thou, O Lady, were filled with grace, so that thou might be the way of our salvation and the means of ascent into the heavenly kingdom." Psalm 131:8 > "Arise, O Lord, into Thy resting place: Thou and the ark, which Thou hast sanctified."  (The Blessed Virgin bodily in Heaven)

Truth of the super-natural order:
All grace starts with God, goes to the hands of the Blessed Virgin, and then into the world. God (Grace Himself) came into the world
by the Blessed Virgin, God never changes, all grace follows the same path to this day and until the end of the world.


Click on the counter for ... visit statistics for this site and it's mirror domains

Ignorance of God's Catholic Dogma ... which is being aggressively hidden with malice ... is not a "loophole" into Heaven.
Mountains of proof in Sources of Dogma and Scripture ... links  >  Section 5.1  and  Section 5.1.1